Your vendors handle your data, run your infrastructure, and process your transactions. When they fail, you fail. Regulators hold you accountable for your supply chain. CyberHeed gives you real visibility into your vendors' compliance posture - not self-reported questionnaires, but AI-validated evidence assessed against the same frameworks you comply with.
The standard approach to third-party risk management is a spreadsheet questionnaire sent once a year. The vendor fills it out in fifteen minutes, self-reports that everything is fine, and you file it until the next audit. Meanwhile, you have no actual visibility into whether their controls are working.
This model is broken. Every major breach in the last five years has involved a third party. SolarWinds. MOVEit. Okta. The organisations that got breached all had vendor questionnaires on file. The questionnaires said everything was fine. Everything was not fine.
Your vendors can be assessed on the same platform, using the same frameworks, with the same AI evidence validation. You see their compliance posture the same way you see your own, backed by evidence, not assertions.
Invite critical and material vendors to complete an assessment against the frameworks relevant to your relationship. ISO 27001 for general IT vendors. CPS 234 for vendors handling regulated data. PCI-DSS for payment processors. The vendor gets their own tenant, their data stays theirs.
Vendors go through the same structured conversations your own team uses. The output is a genuine compliance posture assessment, not a ticked questionnaire.
Vendor evidence is scored the same way yours is, with specific feedback on what's strong and what an auditor would flag. A vendor can't upload a generic policy template and get a passing score.
All your vendors' postures in one view. Filter by framework, risk level, or vendor category. When a vendor's posture drops, you know about it.
Vendor compliance tracked continuously. When evidence expires, when controls drift, when recurring assessments are overdue, the platform flags it.
See every vendor's compliance posture against every relevant framework in one dashboard. Sort by risk level, filter by framework, drill into specific vendors. When the board or the auditor asks about your third-party risk exposure, you have a data-backed answer.
Each vendor has their own tenant. Their assessment data stays theirs. They control what they share with you. This isn't you logging into their system - it's them completing an assessment on a neutral platform and sharing the results. This model works because vendors keep their data sovereignty while you get genuine visibility.
APRA requires regulated entities to maintain a register of material service providers, conduct due diligence, and maintain viable exit strategies. Fourth-party risk must be considered.
Annex A controls A.5.19 through A.5.22 require information security in supplier relationships, supply chain security, and monitoring.
Holds entities accountable for the information security capability of third parties managing their information assets.
NCA ECC Domain 4 covers third-party and cloud computing cybersecurity. DFSA guidelines require DIFC-regulated firms to assess and manage cybersecurity risks from service providers.
Book a demo. We'll show you vendor assessment, AI evidence validation, the aggregated risk dashboard, and how it fits with your existing compliance programme.
Book a Demo