CPS 234, CPS 230, ISO 27001 - and the cross-framework mapping that means work done for one counts toward the rest. Built for the compliance demands of regulated financial institutions.
APRA-regulated entities don't choose one framework. They manage CPS 234, CPS 230, and CPS 232 simultaneously - plus ISO 27001 as the international baseline, and often Essential Eight for ASD alignment. Each framework has overlapping but not identical requirements. Without cross-mapping, that's five separate compliance programmes with significant duplication and no mechanism to capture the efficiency.
CPS 234 sets minimum information security requirements for APRA-regulated entities: banks, credit unions, insurers, superannuation funds. CyberHeed supports CPS 234 compliance end to end.
SmartPrep conversations guide you through asset classification systematically. Documentation reflects your actual asset landscape, not a template. Evidence is AI-validated to confirm it satisfies the CPS 234 requirement, not just a related concept.
CPS 234 requires notification to APRA within 72 hours of a material incident. CyberHeed ensures your Incident Response Plan is documented, current, and evidence-backed. AI feedback identifies gaps between documented capability and the standard's requirements before an incident occurs.
CPS 230 came into effect in July 2025 and overlaps substantially with CPS 234. Controls implemented for one count toward the other when cross-mapped correctly. CyberHeed handles the cross-mapping automatically.
CyberHeed maps controls across CPS 234, CPS 230, and CPS 232 simultaneously. Evidence validated for one automatically counts toward the relevant requirement in the others. Your team focuses on the genuinely new requirements, not on duplicating work.
When your board asks "how are we doing on APRA compliance?", the answer reflects all CPS standards simultaneously, not a separate report for each.
Prudential regulators expect more than a status update. CyberHeed provides structured reporting backed by real data, not assembled from notes.
Board-level reports generated from live data: current posture, maturity trajectory, control coverage, outstanding gaps. The board fulfils its CPS 234 governance obligation with data to support it.
APRA's approach is risk-based. Regulators want to see maturity improving, not just documentation on file. Trajectory data shows where you were, where you are, and the specific improvements made.
When you submit documentation as evidence for a prudential requirement, you receive immediate feedback. You know before any regulatory review whether your evidence satisfies the requirement. You remediate gaps before they become findings. The supervisory process becomes less adversarial and more collaborative.
Information Security (APRA)
Operational Risk Management (APRA)
Business Continuity Management (APRA)
International information security management standard
ASD mitigation strategies for Australian entities
NIST Cybersecurity Framework for international alignment
Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard for payment operations
Dubai Financial Services Authority requirements for DIFC-regulated entities
Dubai Electronic Security Centre Information Security Regulation
Saudi National Cybersecurity Authority Essential Cybersecurity Controls
Cross-mapped controls mean work done for one framework counts toward the rest - automatically.
Book a demo. We'll walk you through CPS 234 and CPS 230 compliance, cross-framework mapping, AI evidence validation, and board-ready reporting.
Book a Demo