Centralised governance. Distributed execution. Each subsidiary manages their own compliance work against the standards you set. You see everything from one dashboard - every entity, every framework, every region.
You set the standards. Subsidiaries execute. But "execute" means twelve different interpretations of the standard, twelve different levels of effort, twelve different reporting formats arriving on twelve different timelines. The governance model depends on visibility you don't have.
CyberHeed resolves that tension by giving each subsidiary its own workspace with AI-guided tools, while giving headquarters an aggregated view across all entities. Standards set centrally. Execution happens locally. Visibility flows upward in real time.
Subsidiaries do their own compliance work, they're the ones who know how their operations run. You define the frameworks and the standards. CyberHeed gives each entity the tools and the structure. Oversight without micromanaging execution.
Each subsidiary operates in a fully isolated workspace, architecturally separated from every other entity. One subsidiary's SmartPrep conversations don't influence another's. Each entity's context is its own.
Each subsidiary runs SmartPrep independently. Their IT manager completes the conversations, documentation is generated, evidence is uploaded and validated, all without requiring your central team to manage the process. You review the output, not the intake. Central team capacity scales with the number of subsidiaries, not against it.
See each subsidiary's progress in real time. Who's started, who's finished, who's stalled. No chasing status updates. Intervene only where it matters.
See compliance posture across every subsidiary, filtered by region, framework, business unit, or maturity level. Board-level reporting becomes a real-time capability, not a quarterly data collection exercise.
Which subsidiaries are on track? Which are behind? Where are the common gaps? Data-backed answers, not estimates assembled from twelve spreadsheets.
View your Australian subsidiaries separately from your GCC entities. Compare regional maturity. See your group's posture against ISO 27001, or just Essential Eight, or just CPS 234. Pull any view, report with confidence.
Track how your group's compliance maturity changes over time. See who's improving, who's plateauing, who needs intervention. A board-level metric, available in real time.
Different regions mean different compliance requirements. CyberHeed supports multiple frameworks simultaneously and cross-maps controls across all of them. Work done for one framework counts toward the next, automatically.
Essential Eight for ASD alignment. CPS 230, 232, and 234 for APRA-regulated entities. ISO 27001 as the international baseline. Australian data residency for all Australian entity data.
ISO 27001 and NIST CSF for global subsidiaries. DESC ISR and NCA ECC for GCC entities. PCI-DSS for payment-processing operations. All managed from one platform, all cross-mapped, all visible in your aggregated dashboard.
When your Melbourne subsidiary achieves ISO 27001 and your Dubai subsidiary needs DESC ISR, roughly 60% of the control overlap is handled automatically.
Without CyberHeed, your central team is the bottleneck. With it, subsidiaries improve their own compliance posture iteratively, at their own pace. Your team shifts from processing to governing.
When a subsidiary uploads evidence, specific feedback comes back within minutes. What's covered, what's missing, what would make it stronger. By the time you look, they've already been through multiple rounds of improvement.
Gaps are identified across every framework for every subsidiary. Each becomes a tracked action item. When a subsidiary has 15 outstanding gaps in incident response, you see it. When they close 10 of them in a month, you see that too. Oversight without micromanagement.
Every subsidiary goes through the same structured process, assessed by the same criteria. Compliance quality doesn't depend on which subsidiary has the more diligent IT manager. The platform sets the floor. Your central team raises the ceiling.
The CISO perspective: multi-framework management, evidence validation, continuous posture, board reporting. [Links to: cisos.html]
Banks and financial institutions navigating CPS 234, CPS 230, ISO 27001, and local regulatory requirements. [Links to: financial-services.html]
The regulatory view: aggregated oversight, thematic reviews, sector-wide posture - the same architecture from the other side. [Links to: regulators.html]
Book a demo. We'll walk you through per-entity workspaces, the aggregated dashboard, regional framework management, and how AI-driven uplift scales compliance across your entire group.
Book a Demo